140 · Nysa and road statics

Town weigh houses and road scales

One wagon, one mass of goods, two documents asking different questions. Move the load along the beam: the ticket on the left will not change, while the report on the right is recalculated at once.

Model: the same load on a beam and two calculations

Beam on two supports, A and B, with a load Model diagram. The 10 t load lies 70% of the way from support A to support B. Support A carries 6.0 t, support B 10.0 t.
Model diagram. Red marker: the load's centre of gravity. Bars: load on supports A and B on a fixed 0–20 t scale (lines every 5 t); grey = tare, dark = cargo. Drag the diagram or use the slider.

Without JavaScript you see the starting setting (10 t load 70% of the way from A to B, tare 6 t) and a table of other positions in the section “One beam, two formulas”. The sliders and buttons need JavaScript.

10 t
70% (from A)

Starting setting: the 10 t load lies 70% of the way from A to B. Move it or change the mass and both calculations will be redone.

Teaching model · not a surviving ticket

Weigh ticket

Question: what quantity of goods?

10.0t net

mass of goods to be settled

Gross mass (wagon + goods)
16.0 t
Tare (empty wagon)
6.0 t
Net = gross − tare
10.0 t
Effect of the load's position
none
Change in net mass from the start
0.0 t

The position of the load does not enter the calculation: net = gross − tare. The form is a modern model, not a copy of an old ticket from Nysa.

Static model · not a WIM measurement

Load report

Question: where does the load fall?

10.0t per support

greatest load: support B

Support A
6.0 t≈ 58.9 kN
Support B
10.0 t≈ 98.1 kN
Sum of supports (= gross)
16.0 t
Share A : B
38% : 62%
Change from the start
A 0.0 t · B 0.0 t

The load in kN is the equivalent mass times 9.81. No legal thresholds: the model does not assess compliance with regulations.

Tare of the empty wagon
Extreme cases and reset

One beam, two formulas

The model assumes a beam simply supported at A and B. The tare acts at the middle of the span, the load at point p (from 0.10 to 0.90 of the distance from A to B). The figures in the boxes are calculated live from the settings above; without JavaScript you see the starting setting.

The ticket asks: what quantity of goods?

The scale weighed the whole wagon. The tare is subtracted from the gross mass, and the rest is goods, regardless of which side of the wagon they lie on.

net = gross − tare = 16.0 − 6.0 = 10.0 t

The report asks: where does the load fall?

Each support carries half the tare and a share of the load that depends on distance. A load nearer B burdens B and relieves A by the same amount.

RA = T/2 + M·(1 − p) = 3.0 + 10.0 × 0.30 = 6.0 t

RB = T/2 + M·p = 3.0 + 10.0 × 0.70 = 10.0 t

RA + RB = 6.0 + 10.0 = 16.0 t = gross 16.0 t

The same 10 t load, 6 t tare, different positions (values calculated from the model's formulas)
PositionNetSupport ASupport BA + B
10% (near A)10.0 t12.0 t4.0 t16.0 t
50% (middle)10.0 t8.0 t8.0 t16.0 t
90% (near B)10.0 t4.0 t12.0 t16.0 t
no load (0 t)0.0 t3.0 t3.0 t6.0 t

The last row has no position, because without a load there is no centre of gravity. The ticket then shows 0 t, while the supports still carry the tare.

How to read the diagram. The red marker is the load's centre of gravity, measured from A (0%) to B (100%); the model allows 10–90%. The grey dot on the beam is the centre of mass of the empty wagon, assumed to be at the middle of the span. The bars rise from the road on a single fixed 0–20 t scale, so a change in mass or tare always changes their height.

Units. The tonne is a unit of mass, while the force of a load is mass times acceleration. At g = 9.81 m/s², a mass of 1 t corresponds to approx. 9.81 kN. The report gives the load on a support in equivalent tonnes (kN ÷ 9.81) and in kN; the kN values are rounded to 0.1, so their sum may differ by 0.1 kN.

Why these two calculations

The Weigh House (Dom Wagi), Sukiennicza 2, Nysa

The building housed the town weigh office and kept the standards of measure. According to the materials given in V2, Nysa probably had the privilege of maintaining a weigh house as early as the beginning of the 14th century, and the scale and the standard ell stood under the arcades [2].

  • 1602–1604 construction of the present house [1]
  • 1947–1948 reconstruction after war damage [1]
  • from 1955 home of the public library [1]

Its present appearance is the result of reconstruction and renovation, so the history of the institution must be distinguished from the appearance of the surviving monument. We do not have the content of the old tickets or the procedure for weighing wagons, which is why the document on the left is our own model. to be checked The dates and description come from V2 and were not reopened here.

The photograph of a façade detail (Jacek Halicki, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0 PL according to the V2 description) is not embedded, so that the page works offline. Open it on Commons [5]; it shows a detail, not the whole building.

What does a WIM system see?

Weighing in motion (WIM, weigh-in-motion) uses sensors that record force as an axle passes. From the signals the system estimates axle loads, and from them the total mass [3]. That is more information than the single figure from a scale.

Our model shows only the principle of distribution over two supports. Measurement in motion must take into account suspension vibrations and station calibration.

In its report on a conference in June 2024, GITD (the Chief Inspectorate of Road Transport) described a discussion of the technical, metrological and legal conditions for automatic weighing [4]. This documents the direction of the work; it does not prove that every roadside point imposes penalties without verification. to be checked Summary from V2.

What the model assumes and what it does not do

Assumptions and limits

  • The ticket is fictional. According to the materials taken over from V2, there was a weigh office in Nysa and standards of measure were kept there (to be checked, see Sources); we have neither a ticket form nor a record of weighing wagons of a given tare.
  • Statics, not motion. A beam simply supported at two points, tare at the middle of the span, the load at a single point. No vibration, braking, suspension or multi-axle vehicles.
  • No legal limits. The model does not say whether a load is permissible and is not meant for issuing fines.
  • To be verified by a metrologist: the balance of reactions and the distinction between mass and force.

What was removed from V2 and why

  • Three scored challenges. Their content was taken over by the table of positions, the extreme-case buttons (0 t, 16 t near A and near B) and the live summary sentence.
  • Saving to localStorage and save buttons. The model is calculated in a fraction of a second and saving added no knowledge; reset returns to the starting setting.
  • A separate balance card and a hidden tare selector. The balance is the row “Sum of supports” in the report, and the tare has a single set of buttons.
  • The constant g. V2 calculated kN with g = 9.80665 but described 9.81; V3 calculates and describes 9.81.
  • Position presets 25/50/75% and the “Partial (8 t)” preset. They were replaced by sliders, ← A / B → buttons in steps of 5 points and the table of positions; only the extreme cases remain, because they show the limits of the model.
  • Mass step of 0.5 t. V3 uses a step of 1 t, so that all figures are exact hundredths of a tonne and A + B equals gross without rounding.
  • An A/B asymmetry indicator with a verbal verdict (“overloaded support”). It was replaced by the rows “Share A : B” and “Change from the start”; the verdict was dropped because the model knows neither legal limits nor load capacity.
  • The table “Why does the same wagon give different figures?” with the row “Socio-economic purpose”. The difference is now carried by the two formulas under the diagram and the table of positions; the row on purposes was dropped because it rested on general claims not backed by this page's sources.
  • Change of the starting setting from 50% to 70%. At 50% both calculations look “equal”; at 70% it is immediately visible that the supports differ while the net mass does not.

Sources for further reading

The references were taken over from V2. They were not reopened in V3, so they are not confirmed here; they are clickable links, not dependencies of the page.

  1. Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa [National Heritage Board of Poland] — Dom WagiHistory, address, alterations and function of the monument in Nysa.
  2. Nysa Tourist Information — the scale and the ellA description of the function of the arcades and of the old standards of measure.
  3. FHWA — Traffic Monitoring Guide, 2022The technical principle of measuring axle loads in WIM systems.
  4. GITD — ITS systems, 14 June 2024The context of Polish work on weighing vehicles in motion.
  5. Wikimedia Commons — detail of the Weigh House in Nysa, 13 July 2014, photo by Jacek HalickiLicence given in V2: CC BY-SA 3.0 PL; the image is not embedded in this page, and the terms should be checked on the file's page.