Niemcza municipality · state of sources from the review of 7 October 2026 · access unverified
Przerzeczyn-ZdrójGeology does not read the office’s decisions.
Choose one of five dates. You get three separate answers: about the facility, about the formal status and about the resource underground, each with its own kind of evidence. A missing reading is shown as missing, not as zero.
Bars in each column, from the top: facility and building, formal status, geological resource. The fill pattern marks the kind of evidence; the pattern key is below the reading.
data from this date
declaration
outside view
description from another date
no reading (not zero)
The columns are successive cut-off dates, not a time scale: almost ten years pass between the first and the second, and 225 days between the last three. The proportions are shown by the time scale in the section “Three clocks on one scale” below. Green means the geological resource only.
Reading for the chosen date
Cut-off date 2 of 5 · 31 December 2024
year 2015 · investor’s declaration
Facility and building
Investor’s declaration
A private website of the revitalisation project gives 2015 as the moment the spa’s operations ended. The exact date is not known. This is the website author’s description, not an official document or a measurement.
The Atlas material contains no archival reading of the status for this year. This is a missing reading, not proof that there was no status.
Verification gap
Geological resource
Description from another date
No reading dated to this year. PIG-PIB (state as of 31 December 2024) describes the waters as weakly mineralised, radon-bearing, possibly with sulphides, circulating in the fissured medium of rocks of the Fore-Sudetic Block. This is a description of structure, not an event from 2015.
Discrepancy. The only answer for this cut-off date comes from the investor. The resource was only described in 2024, and the status has not been read: the three axes have no shared document from this year.
The first cut-off date on this page. The exact date in the declaration is not known, so there is no date to count from.
Kinds of answer: 1 declaration · 1 description from another date · 1 missing reading (3 axes in total).
31 December 2024 · PIG-PIB inventory
Facility and building
Data from this date
Spa activity marked as suspended, no active intakes. Extraction in the whole of 2024: 0 m³. This is a zero read from the balance, not missing data.
The Atlas material does not confirm a reading of the Przerzeczyn row in the official register of spa towns for this year. A missing reading is neither an entry nor the absence of one.
Verification gap
Geological resource
Data from this date
Weakly mineralised, radon-bearing waters, possibly with sulphides. Circulation in the fissured medium of strongly deformed rocks of the Fore-Sudetic Block.
Discrepancy. The resource is described, the facility is suspended with zero extraction, and the status has not been read. Water in the rock does not mean an active offer.
Since the previous cut-off date (year 2015): from 3,288 to 3,652 days. This is a range, because we do not know the exact date in 2015.
Kinds of answer: 2 data from this date · 1 missing reading (3 axes in total).
24 February 2026 · version of the Ministry of Health register
Facility and building
No reading
The Atlas material has no extraction balance more recent than the one for 2024. It is not known whether extraction was resumed. The zero from 2024 does not automatically carry over to 2026.
The Ministry of Health publishes the register of spa towns in a version with this date. The Atlas material does not confirm a reading of the Przerzeczyn row or the basis for the entry. The existence of a file is not proof of status.
Discrepancy. The sharpest official date on this page does not answer the question about status: a dated file is not yet a row that has been read.
Since the previous cut-off date (31 December 2024): 420 days.
Kinds of answer: 1 description from another date · 2 missing readings (3 axes in total).
8 July 2026 · photograph from outside
Facility and building
Outside view
A photograph by Jacek Halicki documents the building’s shape. It does not prove that any work was done, that the road is public, or that the sanatorium or pump room operates. Access unverified. The photograph is not embedded here; the page works offline.
Discrepancy. The most visible answer, the photograph, concerns the least: it shows walls, not an offer, a status or the water.
Since the previous cut-off date (24 February 2026): 134 days.
Kinds of answer: 1 outside view · 1 description from another date · 1 missing reading (3 axes in total).
7 October 2026 · date of the last source review
Facility and building
No reading
No field inspection. The investor’s promises about revitalisation remain independently unchecked. This is a place for “undetermined”, not a verdict that there is no activity.
State according to the source review of 7 October 2026
Formal status
No reading
The present-day formal status, entry and services remain undetermined. They require a reading of current, dated official documents.
The PIG-PIB description as of 31 December 2024 applies. The Atlas has not made a new reading. This is a description of the resource, not medical advice.
Discrepancy. On the day of the source review, only a description of the resource from almost two years earlier is documented. There is no evidence here of an active offer, but there is no evidence of its absence either.
Since the previous cut-off date (8 July 2026): 91 days. The last three cut-off dates are separated by 225 days in total, the earlier ones by almost ten years.
Kinds of answer: 1 description from another date · 2 missing readings (3 axes in total).
The same sentence, five dates
A sentence that is true on one date may contradict the source on another, and be undecidable on yet another. Choose a claim and see how each of the five cut-off dates answers it.
The same date and the same claim: the source may contradict it.
A date different from the one in the source gives “undecided”, not a contradiction.
A photograph of the building proves the shape of the building, not operation, work done or the right of entry.
An investor’s declaration is a declaration until an inspection checks it.
A geological description describes a resource, not an event on a given day.
Three clocks on one scale
The same axis, 1 January 2015 – 31 December 2026 (4,383 days), three different rhythms. The blue vertical line is the cut-off date chosen above.
Facility and building · single observations, nothing is known between them
Formal status · sharp dates, but no reading of the row
Geological resource · a long plane without events
Our own schematic, not a measurement chart or a map. Five cut-off dates: year 2015 (the range of the whole year, because the exact date is unknown), 31 December 2024, 24 February 2026, 8 July 2026 and 7 October 2026. The resource band does not mean that the water was measured every day. It means that the geological description has no events of its own on this scale; the marker shows only the date of the state of the study.
Resource
Geology has the longest clock here. The PIG-PIB description has a state date, 31 December 2024, but that is the date of the study, not of an event. That is why the scale shows a wide band with one reading marker, rather than a series of events.
Status
The office measures time in sharp dates: the register version of 24 February 2026 has its date. The date of the file, however, does not say what is in the Przerzeczyn row. A sharp date without a reading of the row remains a gap here.
Facility
We know the building and its activity from single observations: a declaration from 2015, a balance for 2024, one photograph from 8 July 2026 and a source review of 7 October 2026. We do not fill the span between them with guesswork.
Sources, limits and what was changed
The links were carried over from an earlier version of the page (online review of 7 October 2026). In this version they were not reopened and we do not declare them checked; for each one we have noted what needs checking.
PIG-PIB · zagospodarowanie wód leczniczych i solanek wg stanu na 31.12.2024 [development of medicinal waters and brines as of 31 December 2024]
Basis: suspension of activity, no active intakes, extraction 0 m³ (table, p. 57) and the resource sheet (pp. 280–281). To be checked: page numbers and wording in the file itself.
Historia Przerzeczyna · prywatny projekt rewitalizacji [History of Przerzeczyn · private revitalisation project]
The author’s declaration that operations ended in 2015. Treated as a declaration, not a document. To be checked: the content and date of the page.
Ministerstwo Zdrowia · rejestr uzdrowisk i obszarów ochrony uzdrowiskowej [Ministry of Health · register of spa towns and spa protection areas]
The existence of the version of 24 February 2026. Neither the Przerzeczyn row nor the basis for the entry was confirmed. To be checked: the content of the row and the current version of the register.
Photograph: Jacek Halicki, Wikimedia Commons, 8 July 2026, CC BY-SA 4.0Documents the shape of the building. It does not prove that any work was done, that the road is public, that the sanatorium or pump room operates, or access to the intakes. The photograph is not embedded in this version; it opens after clicking the link.
What this page does not do
It is not medical advice or an assessment of the properties of radon waters.
It gives no opening hours, offer or permission to enter the grounds. Access remains unverified.
It does not use the investor’s visualisation. If one were added, it would be captioned “visualisation” or “declaration”.
It does not settle property boundaries or whether roads are public.
The time scale and the cut-off date table are our own schematics, not a verified map or a measurement chart.
What changed compared with V2
The continuous slider was replaced with five cut-off dates tied to document dates, because the state between the cut-off dates is not known.
The conclusions auditor was replaced with a claim test. The rule was kept: the same date gives a contradiction, a different date gives “undecided”.
The local observation log was dropped. It was not needed to understand the topic, and the page now saves nothing in the browser.
The table of claims with filters moved to a second layer: the content is in the cut-off date readings and in the list of sources.
The photograph loaded from the network was replaced with a link; the diagram of the view from the road was dropped because it suggested unchecked geometry.
.jpg){kind=link}